More muslim antics!

Well if this doesn't prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that they are POLITICAL under the auspicies of being a religion. This alone should strip them of their religious benefits!



CAIR sues to block Oklahoma sharia ban
CAIR’s real agenda revealed “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become
dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America.” Omar Ahmad, CAIR co-founder, quoted in the San Ramon Valley Herald,

July 4, 1998
As the National Journal story reports below, the Oklahoma chapter of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) has filed suit to block implementation of State Question 755, known as the “Save Our State” amendment.

SQ 755 prohibits
Oklahoma courts from using sharia law when judging cases. The amendment was overwhelmingly approved by Oklahoma voters, garnering over 70% support. ACT! for America played a key role in
educating the voters about SQ 755, including two weeks of statewide radio
advertising, 600,000 automated phone calls with a message recorded by former CIA director James Woolsey, editorials and letters to the editor, and radio
interviews.

Prior to the vote CAIR’s Oklahoma director had argued
SQ 755 was unnecessary because there was no chance sharia was coming to
Oklahoma. The CAIR lawsuit now confirms
what CAIR leaders have said in the past—CAIR’s real agenda is the importation of sharia law to America.

Consider Omar Ahmad’s quote above. What is
he actually saying? That sharia law should govern America. Consider this 1993 quote from Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR’s
current communications director, who told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune:
“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of
the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

What is Hooper saying? That sharia law should govern America.

Not surprisingly, in recent years CAIR has been quiet about this agenda, but now that agenda has been smoked out by SQ 755, a measure which is not discriminatory nor inhibits the practice of religious Islam, but protects non-Muslims and Muslims alike from the tyranny of sharia law.
Muslim Group Sues Oklahoma Over Sharia Amendment                                                                  By Althea Fung
 A Muslim advocacy group is suing to stop a measure approved by Oklahoma voters on Tuesday that would ban judges in the state from considering Islamic law in court proceedings.

About 70 percent of voters approved State Question 755, which says “the courts shall not
consider international law or Sharia Law.”

Muneer Awad, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations's Oklahoma chapter, filed the suit in U.S. District Court to block officials from certifying the measure. Awad told the Wall Street  Journal the measure violates the First Amendment right to practice religion without government intervention.

CAIR legal adviser Gadeir Abbas said SQ755 was "designed to stigmatize Muslims, to turn the
Constitution of Oklahoma into a vehicle for oppressing a minority that is currently unpopular."

The "Save Our State Amendment" was proposed by Republican state Sen. Anthony Sykes, who said the amendment isn’t about persecuting Muslims but keeping the Oklahoma judiciary system from “sliding down a slippery slope.”

Former CIA Director Jim Woolsey, who worked to get the amendment passed, said on Fox and Friends this morning that it's about not allowing criminals to use religious code to circumvent the system when they're "prosecuted for beating or assaulting their wives or daughters."

“What we really need to do is make sure people can’t void the impact of
criminal law by citing their religious beliefs,” he said.

In New Jersey, a judge declined to place a restraining order on a Moroccan man who forced his wife to have sex. The ruling was later overturned.

A hearing is set for Monday. 

---