A horrendous switch

This is what has happened all over Europe and Canada and it is coming to the USA faster than you can imagine!

The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez and published in a Spanish newspaper on Jan. 15. 2011. It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe - and to the rest of the world.

THIS WAS IN A SPANISH NEWSPAPER:
"EUROPEAN LIFE DIED IN AUSCHWITZ "

By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez

"I walked down the street in Barcelona and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz ...We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, and talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world.

These are the people we burned.

And under the pretence of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition. We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.. A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves. Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving in to it.

It is now more than sixty years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the six million Jews, twenty million Russians, ten million Christians, and nineteen-hundred Catholic priests who were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved, and beaten, experimented on and humiliated.' Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming the Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.

Socialism-The UKs problems will soon be here!

Want to know where this country is going if we follow this absurd march towards socialism? Europe is broke as a DIRECT RESULT OF THEIR SOCIALIST UTOPIA and now the gig is up. Austerity basically means NO MORE SOCIALISM or you WILL go broke and your country WILL collapse. Read this and find out what the UK is going through, what the world is running away from and where the obama gov. wants to take us! A fool learns from his own mistakes...a wise-man learns from somebody else's!

 A new report out by the Equality and Human Rights Commission has thrown a light on the abuses that invariably come when you socialise healthcare. This one focused on home care for the elderly run by local councils. The chronic disregard of pensioners was found to be so appalling many have been left ‘wanting to die’. Of the 500k people that are under government care, 250k experienced horrendous neglect. Here are some examples of what ‘carers’ get up to:

• Refusal to heat food in a microwave and serve due to “health and safety” concerns
• Soiled sheets unchanged for weeks
• The frail put to bed at 2:45pm
• Lack of time to carry out vital tasks like washing and dressing
• Physical abuse such as rough handling and shouting
• Systematic theft of money
• Leaving food out for a blind and deaf man and not telling him where it is

And it is no better in hospitals, where a study earlier this year exposed similar abuses, like leaving food out of reach, so that patients starved and were so thirsty they couldn’t cry out for help. Hot off the press yesterday, we learn that botched operations are now in the tens of thousands each year, post-operative infections are at an all time high and the death rate due to NHS care is ‘alarmingly high’.

Some elderly with means are even hiring private nurses and having them pose as friends and relatives to ensure they are bathed and fed while in hospital. It is so surreally absurd and obscene, it almost sounds like a comedy sketch, but sadly it is all too real and the tragic result of a human ‘rights’ culture. And it will be the fate of America if Obamacare is not repealed.

When left to the devises of man, a ‘right’ becomes a politicised tool to manipulate for purposes of greed, power or some other nefarious intent. When passed into law, personal responsibility is abrogated and it is left to the courts to fight out whether a right has been denied based on evidence gathered.

Take the simple concept of clean drinking water which the UN Human Rights Council says should be a ‘right’ recognised under international law. Now since we can’t live without it for more than a few days and we all support that everyone should have it, wouldn’t this be a reasonable law? No it would not. 

Just because we call something a ‘right’ does not make it so. The thinking gets muddled when we fail to distinguish the difference between a ‘right’ and a necessity. Water is necessary to human life, so our governments should ensure their citizens have access to it. Unfortunately some governments fail to do so as in developing nations where water access is unsafe or scarce. In 2003 Kerala, India suffered extreme water shortages when corrupt officials granted water rights to a foreign soft drinks manufacturer, allowing them to extract a million gallons a day. To combat this kind of poor government judgment, the UN resolution seeks to let the responsibility fall to the international community, which usually means taxing richer nations to supply that water in various programs. But much of that money will inevitably end up funding a new Mercedes or palatial residence for the local despot. The status quo remains as the tyranny of taxation hampers the ability of private sector initiatives to take action.

It’s the same with health care. In Europe, no politician will renounce social health care for fear of losing his votes. In fact, the best way to gain votes is to denounce its privatization. Money continues to be thrown at services no longer fit for purpose and when that’s gone, the inevitable ‘efficiency ‘ cuts come.

Billions have been spent here in the UK on commissions and reports by outside agencies producing endless reports on how to fix the NHS. Many point to competition being a key to improvement. Yet the country remains frozen into non-action over this sacred cow because of our deeply imbedded ‘rights’ culture. Even Socialist Sweden was able to lift itself from health care hell into market led reforms that have transformed their health service. In former communist Slovakia nearly half of health care is privately serviced.

The British clearly haven’t suffered enough yet, as they cling to the proposition that universal health care is a right and proper way to equalize resources and makes society ‘fair’ for everyone. In the process, free market principles are obliterated forcing people who want other non-government alternatives to fund them themselves while still paying tax to for a universal system. And the basic human interaction of one person helping another in need through the choice that a well developed conscience dictates, is replaced by the state and bureaucratic decisions based on statistics and budgets. Taxation and the appeal to our innate sense of fairness is the oxygen that feeds this system, and it inhibits the freedom for civil society to take action because money is squeezed from that sector. And when a ‘right’ is designated to another party to administer, the culture gets lazy about doing the decent thing. Need can only be truly addressed on an individual basis by people whose objectives are driven by personal charity and not personal greed or power.

‘Rights’ culture turns into tyranny when we fillet out moral virtue and conscience. When you leave the judgement of decent behaviour to another – a politician, a court or a human rights commission, you set up a value system that encourages self-centred thinking devoid of personal responsibility. 

Western civilization was built on Christian values and its attendant rule of law based on Mosaic Law or the Ten Commandants - the ultimate guideline for personal responsibility. Follow these and you have moral order which in turn leads to societal order. ”Honour your father and your mother”, takes care of our elders. If you can’t, then someone in your family will and if they can’t, then it falls to our neighbours, which is way the Christian moral ethic operates. If we swept out government intervention tomorrow, civil society would pick up the baton. Faith groups and others would set up homes for the elderly where volunteers, religious and others would band together supported by private fundraising to do what a culture powered by love does. 

We see this ethic in operation time after time, especially in America after natural disasters. People pitch in and help their neighbour.

America’s founding made this culture of love endemic and is the reason why so many want to flee to its shores, many of whom don’t even understand why this principle works, but they do get that the freedom it spawns does work. The founding fathers also knew the role of government must be to protect this freedom out of which personal responsibility flourishes. This was all placed under God in the Declaration of Independence which recognized the fundamental rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

The culture of ‘rights’ claims to protect, but it can never succeed. Firstly, take God out of the equation and we will never agree on what a ‘right’ is. It becomes a euphemism for decency. Bloated on luxurious budgets at the expense of ordinary people, the EU unceasingly dreams up new goodies to throw into the ‘rights’ bag, as we saw this summer with one member putting forward a bill for the ‘right’ to a summer holiday.

Secondly, where one ‘right’ is enforced, another will be violated. Take airport scanners. In the UK we will soon be required to do a full body scan without a pat down option if a passenger is selected for screening. If we refuse, we lose our right to fly. Flying is not a right, but in a free society a bought service. We choose this service based on how safe they make it, the food, seat comfort, etc. 

The individual airlines in turn should be able to provide the necessary security as they see fit.

Decency dictates that appearing nude to a stranger while being bombarded with ionizing radiation would warrant another method more valid. But despite the unusual move by the EU to direct its member states not to use this type of scanner, the UK is going ahead because of the significant terror threats we face and our ‘rights’ be damned.

In a free society, airlines should be able to choose their methods of security and market them accordingly. Israeli airline EL AL would be the first port of call for consultation as they have cornered the market in determining who poses a threat by psychological profiling, suspect terrorist intelligence and good old fashioned common sense backed by gun wielding marshals on board. Now, that’s a service I would gladly pay for and relax on the flight.

And the rest who still feel violated? Since the majority of terrorists taking to the skies these days are Islamofacists, we could create flights based on Imam-defined rules of safety where Muslims might feel happier about not being profiled. The market would operate freely, we all have our dignity and ‘rights’ intact and we would see who did the better business. Similarly, a free market health care system weeds out the good hospitals from the bad and the impetus to decency of the individual would see to the needs of the truly destitute.

"We'll fix the economy by stealing more from your retirement!"

Well numnuts has given this very same speech each year since he has been in office! Nothing has changed and he is paying for it by raisng taxes and closing loopholes! Most agree that closing loopholes [Taking away tax incentives for business' that can't make it on their own], those loopholes also include a write-off for your mortgage, any money you give to charity, incentives to go green with solar/wind or rebates for buying energy star marked appliances! You will now pay full price. Just to let you know before jumping on the "close the loophole wagon! Well there is more, so read on as it affects EVERYONE:If you read my column with any regularity, you have a good idea of where I stand on the Social Security program. But in a nutshell: I believe the way in which it was initially constructed — and, more importantly, continually expanded over the years — makes it unsustainable in its current form. And that's especially true given the current state of our economy and changing demographics, too.
Yet I'm continually amazed at just how clueless our politicians seem to be on the rather basic equations involved here.
I mean, really: Obama's latest jobs plan involves yet another REDUCTION in the amount Americans will be contributing to the program? Plus, it now ALSO reduces the amount that most American employers will also be paying into the system?
Yowza! To me, this simply sounds like another case of robbing additional money from American retirement coffers to "fix" some other problem that Washington finds more immediate.
Moreover, it's absolutely astounding how many poor projections, half-truths, and outright lies we've been getting fed about this program.
Just look at the sequence of events over the last couple years and you'll see what I mean!
Let's sort the facts out one by one, in chronological order ...
Fact #1. As recently as 2009, the Social Security Administration was predicting that the program would begin taking in less than it paid out in 2017.
Fact #2. Then, just one year later in 2010, the Social Security program took in less money than it paid out. (The first time since the 1980s.)
Fact #3. This annual shortfall was blamed on the poor economy — i.e. fewer employed people paying in and others choosing to retire early, thus increasing the amount of money being paid in benefits.
Fact #4. At the time, the Social Security Administration said it would only be a temporary slip and that a permanent state of deficits would actually begin in 2016. (Note revision from previous estimate.)
Fact #5. In 2011, the Congressional Budget Office came out and said that the Social Security program had already entered a permanent state of annual deficits. (Woops again.)
Fact #6. Despite the idea that Social Security had already reached a permanent state of underfunding, politicians decided to "stimulate the economy" by LOWERING the amount of money each employed American pays into the system in 2011 — from 6.2 percent of the first $106,800 in earnings down to 4.2 percent.
Fact #7. This change was said to be a temporary measure for the year 2011 only.
Fact #8. Last week, President Obama said we should further stimulate the economy and create more jobs by having working Americans pay even less into Social Security in 2012 — i.e. 3.1 percent vs. this year's already-reduced 4.2 percent and the previous full rate of 6.2 percent.
Fact #9. President Obama went one step further by proposing that American employers should also see their part of Social Security contributions slashed in half for the first $5 million in their payrolls for 2012. Please note that this year's reduction did NOT cover employers at all. They have continued to put in 6.2 percent on as much as $106,800 for each of their employees.
Fact #10. It was reiterated that these would be temporary measures, and lawmakers would totally offset the costs with new cost cuts by 2014. Yes, the same lawmakers who took us to the brink of default just a few months ago because they couldn't agree on cost cuts before this new proposal was in play.
All told, these new cuts to Social Security payments will total about $240 billion (out of the $447 billion proposed in Obama's jobs plan). So that's another quarter of a trillion dollars in retirement money we'll have to make up some other time, I guess.
You know, if it weren't such a serious topic, this would make for some great slapstick comedy. Can't you just imagine Abbott and Costello doing a little routine?

Abbott: "Okay, how do we fix Social Security?"
Costello: "Get more money into the system."
Abbott: "Great. How do we do that?"
Costello: "Simple. Create more jobs."
Abbott: "Okay, so how do we do that?"
Costello: "Just stimulate the economy, stupid."
Abbott: "Got it. Just one more question then. What would stimulate the economy?"
Costello: "Putting less money into Social Security, obviously!"

Please bear in mind that you can start the above dialogue at any point — with jobs, the economy, or the Social Security system's state of disrepair. It really doesn't matter because the circular logic will just keep taking you round and round all the same.
Seriously, It's Amazing Just How Bad
This Entire Situation Has Become!
Hey, I'm as glad as anyone to pay less into Social Security for as long as possible. (Or to join the Amish in opting out of the program entirely!)
At the same time, I recognize that the beast that Washington has created is now the retirement lifeblood for tens of millions of Americans. They paid their fair share into the system and are counting on getting their fair share back out.
So I simply have to shake my head at how far off the rails things are getting.
It was bad enough that Washington begged, borrowed and stole from the surpluses that had built up after the last major overhaul ...
It was worse that we were approaching systemic shortfalls going into the second decade of the new millennium ...
And it's absolutely appalling that we are now bankrupting the program even further with new legislation in the name of jump-starting the economy.

NEW BILL IN HOLLAND TO END MULTICULTURALISM

Well I doubt this will send a strong message to the muslim scum, but its a start! Now if EVERY country did this, it would set the islamic scourge back a decade or two in their efforts to dominate our western political systems! The last sentence here say's it all! Congrats to Holland for taking the first courageous step and standing up to the plate while most other countries still turn a blind eye! Even after 911, the USA is in denial! 

A FOOL LEARNS FROM HIS OWN MISTAKES...A WISE-MAN LEARNS FROM SOMEBODY ELSES!

A new parliamentary bill has been presented to the Dutch government to end the multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel societyin Holland.

Under the new integration bill, which the Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on 16 June, immigrants would be required to learn the Dutch language, and a tougher approach would be taken against those who ignore Dutch values or break the law. Extra measures will also be introduced, if necessary, to remove residence permits from immigrants who fail their integration course.

Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner who presented the new bill to parliament

The bill reads:

The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.

A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups.

The government also plans to outlaw forced marriages and as of 1 January 2013 will impose a ban on face-coverings. There are also plans to stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants, because, according to Donner, "it is not the government's job to integrate immigrants."

The umbrella Muslim group Contactorgaan Moslims en Overheid (Muslims and Government Contact) says that although it agrees that immigrants should be better integrated into Dutch society, it is opposed to a ban on burqas.

Polls show that a majority of Dutch voters support the government's scepticism about multiculturalism. According to a Maurice de Hond poll published by the newspaper Trouw on 19 June, 74 per cent of Dutch voters say that immigrants should conform to Dutch values. And 83 per cent of those polled support a ban on burqas in public spaces.

Commentators say that the proper integration of the more than one million Muslims now living in Holland has been a major political issue ever since Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn was assassinated in 2002 for his views on Muslim immigration and Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was stabbed to death in 2004 for producing a film that criticised Islam.

There are now an estimated 1.2 million Muslims in the Netherlands, which is equivalent to about 6 per cent of the country's overall population. Muslim immigrants have become increasingly assertive in carving out a role for Islam within Dutch society. For example, a documentary aired by the television programme Netwerk in June 2009 reported that Dutch law was being systematically undermined by the growth of sharia justice in the Netherlands.

In December 2004, the Dutch Ministry of the Interior published a 60-page report titled From Dawa to Jihad. Prepared by the Dutch intelligence agency AIVD, the report says that the Netherlands is home to up to 50,000 radical Muslims whose key ideological aim is to target the Western way of life and to confront Western political, economic, and cultural domination. It concludes that Dutch society is poorly equipped to resist the threat of radical Islam because of "a culture of permissiveness" that has become synonymous with "closing one's eyes" to multiple transgressions of the law.

Obama foreign policy financing the extermination of all blacks in Tripoli?

Well I am sure this will never hit the mainstreet media!

Obama’s war was in fact unauthorized by Congress and therefore unconstitutional, the picture of the total moral breakdown of the US foreign policy is complete

The blood of the ongoing murder of migrant blacks in Tripoli has a name on it many will never see: President Barack Obama and his Foreign Policy.
Gadaffi is gone; his family safely ensconced in Algeria and the Obama-supported rebels left in charge are now conducting a “large scale cleaning in the areas under their control with the extermination of all blacks in the capital”, according to The Independent.Without the permission of Congress and minus the blessing of We the People, Obama took the US to war in Libya.  He sided with the rebels and ultimately, in effect the “extermination of all blacks”, which was bought and paid for with $839 million American.
There is no proof that the blacks being exterminated—lynchings in many cases—are pro-Gadaffi fighters but increasingly reasonable claims that they are migrant workers, working on construction jobs turned down by native Libyans.“The oil reserves of Libya made the Gaddafi family rich, and also gave Gaddafi the opportunity to invest in developing the infrastructure of the country in order to bribe the population which has been restless for a long time due to the high levels of corruption and bureaucratic red tape. The gigantic construction projects started by Gaddafi required more – and better educated – workforce. Some of it came from Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The bulk of the immigrant workers came from Sub-Saharan Africa. (Independent.co.uk, Aug. 27, 2011).

“Tribalism and racism have always been strong in Islam, especially in those areas of the Arab world which border black Africa – Sudan, Ethiopia, Mauritania, Mali. Libya’s population has always been divided into different tribal groups and driven by strong tribal chauvinism; in fact, the bulk of the rebel army fighting against Gaddafi consists of men of tribes traditionally hostile to Gaddafi’s own tribe, and his most loyal supporters come from his own tribe. In addition to the strong tribal feelings, Libya also has a history of racism, as powerful Arab warlords in the 18th and 19th centuries made fortunes by selling black slaves to the markets in North Africa and the Middle East. Widespread racist views have always been common in the Arab world, and Libya has them too.”

Was it only Hurricane Irene which kept this story from having legs?
A Canada Free Press (CFP) cursory Google search proves that as of yet no major American media outlet has picked up and run with the Independent story.
Bojidar Marinov picked up the story and ran it on his blog godfatherpolitics.com yesterday in the hopes of making it go viral.
A reformed missionary to his native Bulgaria for over 10 years, Marinov preaches and teaches doctrines of the Reformation and a comprehensive Biblical worldview.  Having founded Bulgarian Reformation Ministries in 2001, he and his team have translated over 30,000 pages of Christian literature about the application of the Law of God in every area of man’s life and society, and published those translations online for free.  He has been active in the formation of the Libertarian movement in Bulgaria, a co-founder of the Bulgarian Society for individual Liberty and its first chairman.
“Now, The Independent reports, we have crowds of armed men without any authority or self-restraint to control them, roaming the streets of Tripoli, rounding up every black migrant worker they can find, tying their hands behind their backs and executing them on the spot. The excuse is that those are “Gaddafi loyalists,” but the truth is, no one has been able to provide the proof that these migrant workers actually fought on the side of the dictator. The score-settling is clearly racist, motivated by racist hatred. There is no economic reason for it, for the migrant workers often took the lowest paying jobs that Libyans seldom take,” Marinov wrote.

“Apparently, Obama’s administration involved America in a war without much preparation, without clear understanding of the American interests in the region, and without the slightest effort to ensure the protection of the rights of civilians caught in the war. After proving he is not the “peace” president that the politically motivated Nobel Committee declared him to be, Obama now proves that the last thing he cares for is the protection of black Africans.
“America’s support for the rebels in Libya will prove to be just as harmful to the US position in the region as Clinton’s wars in Yugoslavia in the 1990s when America backed the corrupt, uncivilized and brutal Muslim clans in Bosnia and Kosovo whose main business was smuggling drugs and sexual slaves to Western Europe, and who after the American troops secured their territory, conducted ruthless ethnic cleansing – just as what the Libyan rebels are doing now. When we add to this the fact that Obama’s war was in fact unauthorized by Congress and therefore unconstitutional, the picture of the total moral breakdown of the US foreign policy is complete.”

Thanks to American Thinker.com we already know about Obama’s ties to Gadaffi before the bloody revolution in Libya.
“Last year, right around the time Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi called Obama “our son”, Obama earmarked $400,000 for two Libyan charities. (Camie Davis, American Thinker, July 17, 2010).  “The money was divided between two foundations run by Gaddafi’s children; Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, run by his son Saif, and Wa Attassimou, run by his daughter Aicha.  What noble causes did our tax dollars potentially help support thanks to Obama’s generosity?

“Funding of the ship Amalthea: The Amalthea sailed to Israel with the intent of breaking the Israeli blockade on Hamas.  It carried aid for a pseudo humanitarian crisis and supporters who were said to be “keen on expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people in the plight amidst the siege imposed on Gaza”.  The ship was funded by Saif Gaddafi’s charity,  Gaddafi International Charity and Development Association.  Obama’s friend, Bill Ayers, joined attempt # 1 against Israel’s blockade on Hamas.  Saif joined attempt # 2.  One has to wonder which of Obama’s friends will step up to the plate at attempt # 3.”

Meanwhile, the mewlings of the United Nations in the face of so much civilian bloodshed is absurd.  While black migrant workers are being rounded up, have their hands tied behind their backs and are being executed on the spot, The UN has issued another piece of paper, “an urgent call for restraint by both sides in the aftermath of the Tripoli takeover”.

Obama to Allow 80,000 (Muslim) Refugees in 2011

Well it seems that the threat from muslim extremist attacks from within our own country is growing by leaps and bounds thanks to the leprechaun in chief, and fellow muslim, obama! A 5th grader could deduce the fact that if you want to save your chickens, quit feeding the foxes!

President Barack Hussein Obama, in a determination letter to Congress, has announced that he will allow an additional 80,000 immigrants – – mostly from Islamic countries – – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011. 

Mr. Obama says that the increase in Muslim immigrants “is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.” 

The following “goals” for new immigrants has been set as follows: 

Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000 
East Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,000 
Europe and Central Asia . . . . . . . . . . 2,000 
Latin America/Caribbean. . . . . . . . . . . 5,500 
Near East/South Asia. . . . . . . . . . . 35,500 
Unallocated Reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000 

Refugee Resettlement Watch and other organizations have expressed grave concern that Mr. Obama is allowing so many immigrants into the country while so many Americans remain out of work and living in poverty. 

According to the US Department of Labor, 14.8 million Americans remain unemployed. 6.1 million have been out of work for 27 weeks or over. 

This figure has been challenged by the Union of the Unemployed who provide statistics that the actual number of unemployed Americans is 31 million. 

The U. S. Census Bureau shows that the median household income for Americans has fallen to $49,777 – – a decline of 0.7% in the past year. 

One in seven Americans no longer can feed themselves. 

According to The Wall Street Journal, 14.3% of the American people live in abject poverty. 

A refugee is defined by The US Department of Immigration and Naturalization as someone who has left one’s country due to persecution or a fear of persecution. 


 

This accounts for the sharp rise of Somali communities throughout the country. 

However, the definition of refugee is ‘fudged’ in several cases. “Refugees” who have not left their country due to persecution, according to Mr. Obama’s determination letter, can still be called “refugees” if they are from Iraq, one of the Islamic countries of the former Soviet Union, or Cuba. 

According to Section 413 (a) of the Immigration and Nationalities Act, the Office of Refugee Resettlement is required to submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the refugees. 

The report is supposed to include the number who are on public welfare programs. 

But no report has forthcoming from the Office of Refugee Resettlement since 2007. 

BY PAUL L. WILLIAMS, PH.D. “THE LAST CRUSADE”

Terrorist worked for obama!

The radicalized knucklehead convicted of threatening the lives of the “South Park” creators signed up as a volunteer for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, but by the time Election Day arrived he had concluded it would be a violation of Islamic law to vote in the U.S. election, according to court records.

Wannabe jihadi Zachary Chesser, 21, was sentenced earlier this year to 25 years in federal prison following his guilty plea to making the “South Park” threats as well as providing material support to terrorists (in this case the Somali guerilla group Al-Shabaab).

Chesser, pictured in the mug shot at right, has cooperated with FBI agents and helped prosecutors building a case against Jessie Curtis Morton, with whom Chesser operated the extremist Revolution Muslim web site. Morton was named last week in a felony criminal complaint charging him with threatening the lives of Matt Stone and Trey Parker over a “South Park” episode that included the Prophet Muhammad dressed in a bear suit.

In U.S. District Court filings, Chesser’s lawyer and family members described him as a passionate young man whose interests pinballed from subject to subject (sports, Japanese anime, break dancing, heavy metal, Buddhism, Islam) and often turned on a dime. His attorney reported that despite Chesser’s “increasing devotion to a rigid form of Islam,” he “volunteered to campaign in the 2008 presidential election.” However, “by the time the election came on November 4, 2008, Mr. Chesser had become convinced it would be a violation of Islamic law to vote.”

In a character letter, Chesser’s stepmother recalled him “ranting about how the Koran says he can’t support Obama even though he had signed up to help with the campaign."

Chesser apologized in a “Statement of Responsibility” for the “harm and pain I have caused,” noting that he was “ashamed and bewildered that I was capable of doing it.” Chesser added that, “I have always been a pacificist” and “The jihadi ideology I was drawn into was contrary to everything I had grown up thinking and believing.”

Before this revelation, Chesser--now imprisoned at the federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois--viewed the “South Park” controversy as an opportunity to further disseminate radical messages. In fact, in a wiretapped April 2010 conversation with Morton, Chesser reported that the term “Revolution Muslim” was then the “68th most searched term on Google,” according to the Morton criminal complaint.  Source is the smoking gun:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/internet/south-park-jihadi-was-obama-volunteer-714639

16 Important Facts About Jews, Arabs and Israel ...

Lets bring all you muslim lovers up to speed with the FACTS:

1. Israel became a state circa 1030 B.C., more than two millennia before Islam.
2. Arabs from Israel first began to be called “Palestinians” in 1967 by Yasser Arafat and other Arab leaders, two decades after modern Israeli statehood.
3. After conquering the land in about 1250 B.C., Jews ruled it for more than 1,300 years and have maintained a continuous presence there for 3,300 years.
4. For over 3,000 years, Jerusalem was the Jewish capital. It was never the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even under Jordanian rule, (East) Jerusalem was not made the capital, and no Arab leader came to visit it.
5. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in the Bible, but not once is it mentioned in the Qur’an.
6. King David founded Jerusalem; Mohammed never set foot in it.
7. Jews pray facing Jerusalem; Muslims face Mecca. If they are between the two cities, Muslims pray facing Mecca, with their backs to Jerusalem.
8. In 1948, Arab leaders urged their people to leave, promising to cleanse the land of Jewish presence—some 70% of them fled without ever being ordered by Israel to leave, most of those without ever having seen an Israeli soldier.
9. Virtually the entire Jewish population of Muslim countries had to flee as the result of violence and pogroms.
10. Some 650,000 Arabs left Israel in 1948, while about 850,000 Jews were forced to leave Muslim countries.
11. In spite of the vast territories at their disposal, Arab refugees from Palestine were deliberately prevented from assimilating into their host countries. Of 100 million refugees following World War II, they are the only group to have never integrated with their coreligionists. Most of the Jewish refugees from Europe and Arab lands were settled in Israel, a country no larger than New Jersey.
12. There are 22 Arab countries (with 800 times the land mass of Israel), not counting the Palestinian territories. There is only one Jewish state. Arabs started all five wars against Israel, and lost every one of them.
13. The Fatah and Hamas constitutions still call for the destruction of Israel. Israel has agreed under several proposals to cede most of the West Bank and all of Gaza to the Palestinian Authority, and even supported the arming of its police force after the Oslo Accords in 1993.
14. During the Jordanian occupation, Jewish holy sites were vandalized and were off limits to Jews. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian holy sites are accessible to all faiths and maintained in good order at Israel’s expense.
15. Out of 175 United Nations Security Council resolutions up to 1990, 97 were against Israel; out of 690 General Assembly resolutions, 429 were against Israel;
16. The U.N. was silent when the Jordanians destroyed 58 synagogues in the old city of Jerusalem. It remained silent while Jordan systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives, and it remained silent when Jordan enforced apartheid laws preventing Jews from accessing the Temple Mount and Western Wall (Kotel).
17. 16-facts-muslims-hate